On top of that, some things are difficult with mikrotik, like vlans and vpn (according to me and what I read anyway). You don't get a lot of handholding and are expected to know what you are doing. Mikrotik offers powerful hardware at good prices, with a lot of features. It’s still ugly compared to Ubiquiti, but I’d rather have a work horse versus putting lipstick on a pig. Put wine on your Mac so you can run Winbox. If you want something that just works, every time, and gives you the flexibility to do ANYTHING, start learning MikroTik, and don’t ever use WebFig. If you just want a cheap AP, cheap switch, cheap router/firewall, all with good GUI, Ubiquiti is your choice. Ubiquiti is just a cheap version of everything else out there, with a specific use for every piece of hardware. It has saved my butt and made me look like a hero more times than I can count in major televised events that don’t allow for failure. I use and deploy MikroTik in nearly every network I manage due to its flexibility and price. I’ve also been a trainer for both Ubiquiti and MikroTik and other brands in the past, so fell like I have a pretty good handle on what is in the market place. I work in pro sports venues and have worked with nearly every brand of network hardware. How about that GUI? I believe there is something, but it’s hard to see much evidence of this as almost all configuration questions I see get answered with configuration lines. Ideal for me would be if this device comes with a nice GUI, but also the ability to pop the hood and get a little more complicated in the setup through the command line interface. The switch from pfSense was a result of a really nice hardware package at a reasonable price (the RB4011-based all-in-one for $249), and the idea of RouterOS. But I ended up deciding on pfSense because it has a decent GUI and seems exceptionally powerful. When I asked a friend for a recommendation on where to turn for networking gear, he suggest Ubiquiti as it has a beautiful GUI. It gives me a beautifully polished graphical user interface, but through the Terminal also lets me pop the hood so I can wiggle the carburetor and check the oil. With this post, I’m inviting those familiar with MikroTik gear to give me their view. While I’m not really sure what that all means, and I am not planning on operating a ‘homelab’ for the purpose of learning marketable skills, I’ve not been able to shake the comments off. Their main argument was that it is needlessly complex and not “standard” enough. A few days ago I was told by some ‘homelab enthusiasts’ that MikroTik was not a good choice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |